如果再想起青春里那个爱过、鸳鸯痛过的人,鸳鸯你还会有遗憾吗?当热情阳光的黄子捷(连晨翔 饰)遇见单纯善良的张筱华(吴子霏 饰),从一开始的互不打扰,到两个人慢慢互相了解、难掩心动,爱情的火花慢慢绽放,但命运的齿轮也仍在向前……世上最遗憾的不是不爱了,而是明明相爱却无能为力,错过一辆车可以等,但错过一个人,就是一辈子。
如果再想起青春里那个爱过、鸳鸯痛过的人,鸳鸯你还会有遗憾吗?当热情阳光的黄子捷(连晨翔 饰)遇见单纯善良的张筱华(吴子霏 饰),从一开始的互不打扰,到两个人慢慢互相了解、难掩心动,爱情的火花慢慢绽放,但命运的齿轮也仍在向前……世上最遗憾的不是不爱了,而是明明相爱却无能为力,错过一辆车可以等,但错过一个人,就是一辈子。
回复 :我們的宗教就是你的宗教!不信我們的宗教就訓你!一群年輕女性,信奉容貌就該乾淨,舉止就該端莊婉約,交友就該純潔自愛。她們深信耶穌和傳統教條,殷切等待某日走進家庭婚姻;夜幕降臨,她們卻在城市裡襲擊她們眼中行為不檢點的單身女子,處以私刑一陣毒打,要求在鏡頭前懺悔,甚至傳網公審。女子之一的瑪麗雅,在某次夜晚行動中傷到無暇的臉龐,留下傷疤,心中堅若磐石的信仰也逐漸崩解;得不到的永遠在騷動,她開始質疑自己的信仰,想起傳言中她們教訓過的一位女子,近乎毀容的臉龐。瑪麗雅精神上逐漸和那樣宛若梅杜莎的面容疊合⋯⋯面對社會沈重的期待、宗教窒息式的束縛,終於大聲吼叫出來!
回复 :20世纪初,贫穷的意大利少年补鞋匠萨瓦托·菲拉格慕从那不勒斯航行到美国,以寻求更好的生活。他定居在南加州,并在寂静的时代成为好莱坞的制鞋匠。1927年,他回到意大利,在佛罗伦萨创立了同名奢侈品牌。
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb