剧情简介
在自己深爱的父亲去死之后，霹雳9岁的乔伊发现自己处于一连串怪象之中包括心灵遥感，霹雳来自坟墓的电话还有险恶的口技长演者假人的残酷杀人本能但是相关部门到远调查乔伊的怪象的时候他释放出超自然的恐怖能量，科学家们对此无法理解而东手无策…只有这个小男孩有希望能让一切停止....
霹雳五号续集
在自己深爱的父亲去死之后，霹雳9岁的乔伊发现自己处于一连串怪象之中包括心灵遥感，霹雳来自坟墓的电话还有险恶的口技长演者假人的残酷杀人本能但是相关部门到远调查乔伊的怪象的时候他释放出超自然的恐怖能量，科学家们对此无法理解而东手无策…只有这个小男孩有希望能让一切停止....
拷秋勤
回复 :阿斯特拉罕羊皮取自初生黑羊，刚出娘胎即面临残酷命运。十二岁男孩被送到乡间的寄养家庭，别人看他桀骜不驯，看不见他的受伤灵魂。寄养家长认为他难以管教，但为了领取津贴，维持着痛苦关系。大卫狄柏塞维利亚首部长片，于家乡取景，向莫里斯皮亚勒的《赤裸的童年》取经，对法国的寄养制度作出含蓄批评。落花有意流水无情，乡村生活潜藏性与暴力，甚至恋童暗示，终于在巴哈〈羔羊赞〉的烘托下，男孩内心煎熬与渴望倾泻而出，激荡出复杂又强烈的情感。
计镇华
回复 :高雄是日治時期的軍事重地，也是二二八事件中遭受嚴重軍事鎮壓的地區。本片尋訪經歷過二戰的台籍日本兵、二二八事件雄中自衛隊成員，及二二八事件受難者遺族，他們走過被噤聲的年代，恐懼及創傷如影隨形，成為一生都無法卸下的歷史馱負，鏡頭緩緩隨著他們的日常身影流動，他們從日常中撿拾記憶，還原歷經歷史劫難的生命軌跡，從被迫參戰的無奈際遇，到失去親人又背負標籤、跌宕波折的成長處境，沒有悲憤控訴，只有娓娓傾吐，讓他們重新擁有屬於自己的個體傷痕記憶。深植在他們身體裡的記憶，也留存在時間、空間的縫隙中，本片亦靜靜凝望散落高雄各地的軍事遺址，見證著工兵的血淚與青春；當倖存者逐漸凋零，就以訴說及凝視抵抗遺忘，記憶猶如在這塊土地上努力生長的野番茄，結出強韌的生命果實，展現堅毅不拔的姿態。
艾薇儿
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
