本片为1997年《我知道你去年夏天乾了什么》(I Know What You Did Last Summer)的续集，李丽制作人采用原班人马。 本片延续了第一集的故事结尾，李丽两年前茱莉（詹妮弗·洛夫·休伊特 Jennifer Love Hewitt 饰）和朋友们开车撞死了一个 路人后众人遭到“铁钩杀手”的报复。最后茱莉虽然得以生还，但这团阴影却始终笼罩着她。 两年后，茱莉的好友卡拉赢得了电台的猜奖，卡拉及其男友泰洛要请茱莉与同班同学维尔，四人一同前往巴哈马的塔湾岛度假。就在享受阳光沙滩的同时，一连串的离奇事件也在这个孤岛上展开，旅馆里的工作人员也不明原因的接二连三死亡。茱莉收到“I Still Know What You Did Last Summer”的警告，众人惊恐万分。难道是“铁钩杀手”死而复生？这一次凶手是谁？冷酷的杀手正在等待着他们……
李佳璐
回复 :阿尼•科宁汉姆（Keith Gordon 饰）是某所高中内极不起眼的学生，他沉默寡言、木讷内向。父母对他没有过多关注，身边只有女友丽（Alexandra Paul 饰）和好哥们丹尼斯（John Stockwell 饰），再无其他朋友。某天，阿尼看上一辆1958年产的二 手普利茅斯•复仇女神（Plymouth Fury），他立刻爱上了这辆车，毫不犹豫将其买了下来。但是阿尼的举止渐渐变得奇怪起来，他不再关心周遭世界，而是将所有注意力都放在这辆名为“克莉丝汀”的车上。当了解到克莉丝汀的背景之后，丽和丹尼斯决定摧毁汽车，拯救阿尼。然而克莉丝汀似乎对挡在她面前的人毫不留情……
芭比
回复 :某泰国小青年乘车夜归，结果坐错公车，在一个陌生的地方下车。将错就错，他逛进一家书店，发现一本名为《见鬼10法》的书，书中罗列了换死人角膜、怀孕自杀、杯仙、十字路鬼、捉鬼迷藏、涂尸泥、屋内打伞、午夜对镜梳头、倒栽头和去死等十种见鬼方法，恐怖惊险却又引人入胜。在好奇心的驱使下，青年将书买回家中。不久，他和另外四个朋友聚在一起，这几个年轻气盛且胆大妄为的年轻人按照书中的指示玩起了见鬼游戏。然而，见鬼10法的恐怖之处在于，一旦开始便要进行到底，即使因此失去了性命……
方大同
回复 :Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
