临海古都镰仓，亚洲顺山而成的小镇，亚洲不起眼的角落里生活着香田家四姐妹。她们的父亲早年和情人离家出走，母亲则干脆将女儿们抛给了外婆照顾。外婆去世后，外孙女们继承了这栋有着悠久历史的大房子。过早担负起家庭重任的大姐香田幸（绫濑遥 饰），尽心尽力照顾着两个妹妹佳乃（长泽雅美 饰）、千佳（夏帆 饰）健康成长。这一天，父亲去世的消息传到姐妹手中。她们结伴而行参加了父亲的葬礼，并且结识了从未谋面的异母妹妹浅野铃（广濑丝丝 饰）。许是血缘中的亲近之感，幸在临行前邀请铃搬来镰仓同住。未过多久，抱着对姐姐们的憧憬，铃迈入了父亲曾经生活过的房子。四季流转，姐妹们的故事悄然上演……本片根据吉田秋生的同名漫画改编。
小室哲哉
回复 :黑道大哥宝（徐克 饰）为人凶暴，却有一个慢性子老好人亲弟弟雄（曾志伟 饰）鞍前马后，雄连女友被人夺走这种事也要宝出面抻头。宝犯罪事发即将入狱半年，他在服刑前嘱托雄照顾好老情人萍（李殿朗 饰）和小情人咪咪（李丽珍 饰）。雄一照面就被萍给了下马威，又卷入她和高利贷团伙的纷争，两人脱身后匆匆赶赴日本寻找咪咪，发现咪咪的处境也颇为棘手，雄为帮两个大嫂脱身绞尽脑汁，另一方面又要各种欺瞒来防止她们发现彼此的身份。三人回到香港后事情终于败露，萍大哭大闹却被宝喝止，在等待宝出狱的日子里，雄与咪咪之间产生了感情，但如何去面对大哥，又成了雄无法化解的心结……本片获1988年香港电影金像奖最佳剪辑奖。
许茹芸
回复 :杨百万（陈玺旭 饰）和妻子马丽莲（高叶 饰）共同经营着名为仙客来的饭店。马丽莲样貌出众个性泼辣，让杨百万很没有安全感，整日疑神疑鬼，担心头上不知什么时候就多了一顶绿帽子。某日，杨百万撞见马丽莲和一陌生男子共处一室，愤怒中，他暴打了该男子，却反而遭到了妻子的一顿修理。认定了自己遭到背叛的杨百万找到了神医毕见效（曹瑞 饰），花费巨款委托后者找杀手做掉马丽莲以解自己的心头之恨。约定当晚，杨百万药倒了马丽莲后离开，却在无意之中发现了妻子的清白，而彼时杀手已经默默的来到了马丽莲的身边。心急如焚的杨百万赶回家，没想到眼前出现的竟然是毕见效的“尸体”和昏倒的马丽莲。
亚瑟小子
回复 :The subtitle of Jean-Marie Straub and Danièle Huillet’s first feature, from 1965, “Only Violence Helps Where Violence Reigns,” suggests the fierce political program evoked by their rigorous aesthetic. The pretext of the film, set in Cologne, is Heinrich Böll’s novel “Billiards at Half Past Nine,” which they strip down to a handful of stark events and film with a confrontational angularity akin to Bartók’s music that adorns the soundtrack. The subtlest of cues accompany the story’s complex flashbacks. The middle-aged Robert Fähmel tells a young hotel bellhop of persecutions under the Third Reich; his elderly father, Heinrich, an architect famed for a local abbey, recalls the militarism of the First World War, when his wife, Johanna, incurred trouble for insulting the Kaiser. A third-generation Fähmel is considering architecture, just as the exiled brother of Robert’s late wife, returns, only to be met by their former torturer, now a West German official taking part in a celebratory parade of war veterans. Straub and Huillet make the layers of history live in the present tense, which they judge severely. The tamped-down acting and the spare, tense visual rhetoric suggest a state of moral crisis as well as the response—as much in style as in substance—that it demands.
